intj and dating - Keith olberman dating

An apology is this President's only hope of regaining the slightest measure of confidence, of what has been, for nearly two years, a clear majority of his people.

Not "confidence" in his policies nor in his designs nor even in something as narrowly focused as which vision of torture shall prevail -- his, or that of the man who has sent him into apoplexy, Colin Powell.

Five years later this is still just a background for a photo-op. At the dedication of the Gettysburg Memorial -- barely four months after the last soldier staggered from another Pennsylvania field -- Mr.

The President of the United States owes this country an apology. The last of them, it appears, was the very man whose letter provoked the President into the conduct, for which the apology is essential.

There are now none around him who would tell him or could.

That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government.” Those incendiary thoughts came, of course, from a prior holder of your job, Mr. Thus the debate over the Geneva Conventions, might not be about further interrogations of detainees, but about those already conducted, and the possible liability of the administration, for them. There needs to be an apology from the President of the United States. We must know that, to you, thought with which you disagree -- and even voice with which you disagree and even action with which you disagree -- are still sacrosanct to you.

The philosopher Voltaire once insisted to another author, "I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write." Since the nation's birth, Mr.

Bush, we have misquoted and even embellished that statement, but we have served ourselves well, by subscribing to its essence. 18, 2006 | Half a lifetime ago, I worked in this now-empty space.

Oddly, there are other words of Voltaire's that are more pertinent still, just now. And for 40 days after the attacks, I worked here again, trying to make sense of what happened, and was yet to happen, as a reporter.However, of all the things those of us who were here five years ago could have forecast -- of all the nightmares that unfolded before our eyes, and the others that unfolded only in our minds -- none of us could have predicted this. Five years later this country's wound is still open.Five years later this country's mass grave is still unmarked.It now shows us a President who has decided that of all our commanders-in-chief, ever, he alone has had the knowledge necessary to alter and re-shape our inalienable rights. Powell's letter -- cautionary, concerned, predominantly supportive -- can induce from you such wrath and such intolerance, what would you say were this statement to be shouted to you by a reporter, or written to you by a colleague? Would you call it "unacceptable" for Jefferson to think such things, or to write them? But at least it provides an alternative possibility as to why the President's words were at such variance from the entire history of this country. Bush, than that you truly believe we should live in a United States of America in which a thought is unacceptable.This is a frightening, and a dangerous, delusion, Mr. "Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Between your confidence in your infallibility, sir, and your demonizing of dissent, and now these rages better suited to a thwarted three-year old, you have left the unnerving sense of a White House coming unglued - a chilling suspicion that perhaps we have not seen the peak of the anger; that we can no longer forecast what next will be said to, or about, anyone who disagrees. On this newscast last Friday night, Constitiutional law Professor Jonathan Turley of George Washington University, suggested that at some point in the near future some of the "detainees" transferred from secret CIA cells to Guantanamo, will finally get to tell the Red Cross that they have indeed been tortured. There needs to be a delegation of responsible leaders -- Republicans or otherwise -- who can sit you down as Barry Goldwater and Hugh Scott once sat Richard Nixon down - and explain the reality of the situation you have created. Bush, the others -- for warnings unheeded five years ago, for war unjustified four years ago, for battle unprepared three years ago -- they are not weighted with the urgency and necessity of this one.What all of us will agree on, is that we have the right -- we have the duty -- to think about the comparison. With increasing rage, he and his administration have begun to tell us, we are not permitted to disagree with them, that we cannot be right, that Colin Powell cannot be right. In four simple words last Friday, the President brought into sharp focus what has been only vaguely clear these past five-and-a-half years - the way the terrain at night is perceptible only during an angry flash of lightning, and then, a second later, all again is dark. That flash of lightning freezes at the distant horizon, and we can just make out a world in which authority can actually suggest it has become unacceptable to think.

Tags: , ,